WW1 Centenary

Great War Centenary 2014-2018 website by Paul Reed

2014: Dawn of the Great War Centenary

4 Comments

MGC01edit

As we pass into the New Year, 2014 brings with it the approach of the Great War Centenary. While it will not be until the summer before the actual anniversary of the start of the First World War begins, books are already appearing and the planned television coverage for the centenary starts this month with some of the first BBC material being aired, including Jeremy Paxman’s flagship four-part series about Britain in WW1.

Discussion on how the centenary should be interpreted began last year but the announcement of a commemorative coin from the Royal Mint, showing a rather ugly depiction of Lord Kitchener – no doubt inspired by the famous recruiting poster – kicked off a bit of a Twitter storm as to whether Kitchener was an appropriate figure to feature; was he too ‘martial’ a symbol? Some forget that Kitchener died in the war and was in the fact the most senior ranking soldier to die between 1914 and 1918; he is as much part of the ‘glorious dead’ as any other casualty. More debate followed with Michael Gove’s statement that “Left wing myths peddled by left wing historians and comedies like Blackadder belittle Britain and clear Germany of blame.” Already politicians are beginning to use the Centenary to push their own political agendas and one wonders how much this will increase as the 2015 looms closer.

For many the politicisation of the Great War Centenary and the issue of cheap souvenirs only confirms what they believe: that 2014-2018 could be as much of a disaster for those interested in WW1, as a blessing. I have some sympathy with this view but the web, Twitter and other aspects of social media are a way to redress this.However, it will require some action. Those who have studied the Great War long before it became fashionable, those who have moved the knowledge beyond Alan Clark, and those few who interviewed WW1 veterans have the perfect time to share that knowledge with a wider audience, who will be keen to see genuinely new material and hear new ideas as the centenary unfolds. It isn’t enough to sit there and moan. It is about engagement: realise that a subject no-one cared about when I first went to the Somme more than thirty years ago is now almost mainstream and use that – so a wider tale can be told than just the pronouncements of a few politicians and authors of fiction. The Great War Centenary is our challenge, and I hope that many will rise to it: evidence from the Blogosphere and projects like Lives of WW1 seem to demonstrate that this has already begun.

 

 

Advertisements

Author: ww1centenary

Military Historian & author who works in Television: visiting & interpreting battlefields all over the world. Currently working on WW1 projects for 2014-18.

4 thoughts on “2014: Dawn of the Great War Centenary

  1. Having researched WWI for the past six or seven years as part of writing historical fiction set in that era, I would suggest that it only takes a bit of time reading novels, WWI diaries, and a few non-fiction sources to appreciate the sheer horror of what soldiers endured, the shocking waste of life that occurred and the incredible debt we owe.

  2. Thanks for your interesting post – I have to confess we were part of the twitter storm surrounding the Kitchener coin as too martial a symbol, though I do acknowledge your point. I think you’re also right about the great challenge of the centenary year, and I think we can all do our part in showing some of the forgotten or actively neglected histories of the war to a wider audience. The story of 1914-1918 is so much larger than the commonly told stories and it is both a challenge and an opportunity to use public interest to spread awareness of all the issues raised and created by the First World War.

    As a simple example from our own work – on Conscientious Objection – the war for us “ends” not in 1918, but in 1919, when the last COs were released from prison sentences. COs as a whole have been largely forgotten, but the existence of some still in prison a year after the end of the war, incarcerated for a “crime” that no longer existed is a still more obscure story.

  3. So far emphasis seems to be quite naturally related to the military service men & women and their war activities. I do hope others are also considering the social and industrial issues and achievements at home. When considering the aviation related WW1 museum display that I am working on I felt the focus should be on the technology growth and the everyday people both service and civilian that made it happen. Remembering the victories & defeats the trauma and heroism of the fighting service man is one thing but activities at home from all sectors of society be it social , industrial or technological were dramatic and not without sacrifice in supporting the services and should also be remembered.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s